|
|
Post by Rick Pinkney on Oct 26, 2013 20:19:24 GMT -5
Could make for a long day.
|
|
|
|
Post by Eric Roussin on Oct 26, 2013 20:22:11 GMT -5
Absolutely! Especially if we will be switching to fewer, but larger classes.
|
|
|
|
Post by cleduc on Oct 26, 2013 20:39:10 GMT -5
I don't understand how this will save money... Rick can you elaborate on this?
|
|
|
|
Post by Rick Pinkney on Oct 26, 2013 20:45:06 GMT -5
Fewer classes save money. Making the classes more interesting and competitive brings out more pullers.
|
|
|
|
Post by Adam Koenig on Oct 27, 2013 1:33:53 GMT -5
More pulling is always better for us. Especially at Nats where you spend a grand on a weekend to hopefully not go 2 and out.
|
|
Windover
Local Muscle
Pin or die trying!!
Posts: 198
|
Post by Windover on Oct 27, 2013 4:39:28 GMT -5
It always makes for some interesting matchups as well that you may not get to see in double elim. I have come many a time from the C side to place in the finals. I am waiting for someone to point out that it is not WAF way of doing things, and my answer is whatever way we go, with weight classes, format whatever, they dont give a rats pootootey what we do over here as long as we submit our monies and register correctly.
If you want to draw more pullers, we need to create more pulling!! Triple elim helps give a better, not perfect, but better ranking of pullers as well.
|
|
|
|
Post by Will Sarty on Oct 27, 2013 6:09:48 GMT -5
Triple Elim!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by blanks33 on Oct 27, 2013 10:37:49 GMT -5
Never pulled in triple elim tournament but fewer weight classes are the way to go. It's getting ridiculous to crown 36 national champs and 57 if you count masters/grand masters.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Espey on Oct 27, 2013 12:48:52 GMT -5
Less weight classes and more pulling sounds great to me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rick Pinkney on Oct 30, 2013 17:39:12 GMT -5
Again I can't stress enough to contact your Provincial President to vote for this.
|
|
