|
|
Post by chrisgobby on Nov 22, 2013 18:12:59 GMT -5
All depends on the quality of the lobster.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jeff Miller on Nov 24, 2013 14:19:46 GMT -5
One thing with triple elimination that I forgot about - I think you need a minimum of 5 people per class for it to work. Some classes don't get there, so that means Andrew's preference for a C bracket competing for third place makes sense. (There are lots of little issues like this to sort through at the end game stage). (Edit Nov 25, 2013 - Eric just informed me that there is no minimum for triple elimination - oops!)
|
|
|
|
Post by chrisgobby on Nov 24, 2013 15:36:09 GMT -5
If the number of classes at nationals are cut down and we still can't get a minimum of 5 pullers... Time to pack it in.
|
|
|
|
Post by Eric Roussin on Nov 24, 2013 15:59:23 GMT -5
Why do you say triple elimination doesn't work if there are less than five competitors?
|
|
|
|
Post by Kyle Roy on Nov 24, 2013 16:12:33 GMT -5
71 - 0 - 158.
81 - 159- 179
94 - 180-209
103 - 210-229
103+ 230+
Triple elimination
|
|
|
|
Post by Kyle Roy on Nov 24, 2013 16:48:45 GMT -5
I would run a juniors class 13 to 17 years old
63
75
82
91
91+
Maybe not at this nationals but the next
|
|
|
|
Post by Rick Pinkney on Nov 24, 2013 17:18:11 GMT -5
We discussed the "C" side issue at our AGM and everyone was in favour of the "C" side being able to still have a chance to win. MacPhail has done it
|
|
|
|
Post by Jeff Miller on Nov 24, 2013 17:22:13 GMT -5
Maybe I am wrong about that, I just saw on the printyourbrackets.com website that triple elim starts at 5 entries - I guess yeah on second thought maybe that does work? I've never ran triple elimination before.
|
|
|
|
Post by Eric Roussin on Nov 24, 2013 19:35:34 GMT -5
There's no minimum. If there are only two pullers, then it's the same thing as a best 3 of 5.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jeff Miller on Nov 25, 2013 11:21:33 GMT -5
Oh, thanks Eric!
|
|
