|
|
Post by joey costello on Oct 24, 2013 20:51:45 GMT -5
I like Ricks second choice.
65, 70, 75, 80, 90, 105, 105+
It is closer to WAF classes without having to many and not losing too many.
|
|
|
|
Post by mwiggins on Oct 25, 2013 15:11:47 GMT -5
i like second choice as well could modify lightest class slightly lower?
|
|
|
|
Post by Jeff Miller on Oct 25, 2013 15:29:24 GMT -5
Refined (+6, +7kg, +8kg, +9kg, +10kg):
63, 69, 76, 84, 95, 105, 105+
(139 lbs, 152 lbs, 168 lbs, 185 lbs, 209 lbs, 231 lbs)
I don't see the reason for chosing a few WAF classes; it just makes things not as good as they could be...classes do not need to be divisible by 5kg.
|
|
|
|
Post by Will Sarty on Oct 25, 2013 18:23:14 GMT -5
Refined (+6, +7kg, +8kg, +9kg, +10kg): 63, 69, 76, 84, 95, 105, 105+ (139 lbs, 152 lbs, 168 lbs, 185 lbs, 209 lbs, 231 lbs) I don't see the reason for chosing a few WAF classes; it just makes things not as good as they could be...classes do not need to be divisible by 5kg. Those look great Jeff! |
|
|
|
Post by Eric Roussin on Oct 25, 2013 19:18:39 GMT -5
^I agree. If we go with seven classes, then I vote for these. If we go with six, then I vote for the one's Will listed (Rick's option 3). Both make great sense!
I hope that whatever changes get made, get made for the 2014 Nationals. I think classes such as these, combined with triple elimination, would create a lot of interest.
|
|
Joel Goodsell
Board Novice
I gave up Tuesday night hockey beer league to compete regularly. That's dedication for ya.
Posts: 14
|
Post by Joel Goodsell on Oct 25, 2013 20:08:59 GMT -5
Not really in favor of having to cut more weight. Im sure there are more then a few like me out there. number two for me
|
|
|
|
Post by Tyrrell Wojcichowsky on Oct 25, 2013 21:27:26 GMT -5
Don't cut. Get meaner.
|
|
|
|
Post by weights on Oct 26, 2013 9:31:54 GMT -5
I have been saying this for years.
63,70,78,86,95,105,105+
138,154,171,189,209,231,231+
|
|
|
|
Post by John Milne on Oct 26, 2013 11:48:15 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Jeff Miller on Oct 27, 2013 18:56:50 GMT -5
Just realized my math sucks - added 11kg between the 84kg - 95kg class. Jeff Slater's (weights) would be the proper equivalent for starting and ending at the same point.
This is Nemiroff class divisions plus a 105 kg class added...which has been discussed previously, and I like too.
|
|
