|
|
Post by Jeff Miller on Oct 30, 2013 10:45:27 GMT -5
For everyone to see what the mathematical version of a 6-class system looks like (using 63kg min, 105kg max), and a comparison to UAL classes shown below.
Math-based 6-Class System
Multiplier Used: 1.135
139 lbs 63 kg
158 lbs 72 kg
179 lbs 81 kg
203 lbs 92 kg
231 lbs 105 kg
231+ lbs 105+ kg
UAL Classes + 140lbs (6 Class)
140 lbs 63 kg
165 lbs 75 kg
185 lbs 84 kg
205 lbs 93 kg
235 lbs 107 kg
235+ lbs 107+ kg
|
|
|
|
Post by Eric Roussin on Oct 30, 2013 11:35:44 GMT -5
I'm good with a 6- or 7-class system, as long as the breaks make sense (as above).
|
|
|
|
Post by Jeff Miller on Oct 30, 2013 13:03:05 GMT -5
Me too
|
|
|
|
Post by Will Sarty on Oct 30, 2013 13:04:46 GMT -5
I definately prefer the 7 class system you listed over this but yes either 6 or 7 if they make sense
|
|
|
|
Post by Jeff Miller on Oct 30, 2013 14:09:40 GMT -5
Actually those UAL classes look pretty decent to me too. Of course they're Americanized (5lb increments), but I like pounds!
|
|
|
|
Post by Rick Pinkney on Oct 30, 2013 17:04:04 GMT -5
The thing I don't like about the UAL classes is that there is 25lbs between 140 -165, but then 20lbs from 165-185 and again to 205. The increases should get bigger as you go up.
|
|
|
|
Post by Eric Roussin on Oct 30, 2013 17:21:16 GMT -5
^That's why I like the UAL classes less as well.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jeff Miller on Oct 30, 2013 18:18:42 GMT -5
Good point Rick.
|
|
|
|
Post by Adam Koenig on Oct 30, 2013 22:55:28 GMT -5
I've always liked the Nemiroff classes with an extra division for super heavy weights
|
|
|
|
Post by Rick Pinkney on Oct 31, 2013 2:56:40 GMT -5
I think a 105+ class is heavy enough for Canada. Does anyone think there should be something heavier?
|
|
